European Journal of Cancer
Volume 37, Issue 14 , Pages 1729-1735 , September 2001

Response shift in the perception of health for utility evaluation: an explorative investigation

  • J Bernhard

      Affiliations

    • SIAK Coordinating Center, Effingerstr. 40, CH-3008 Bern, Switzerland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +41-31-389-9191; fax: +41-31-389-9200
  • ,
  • A Lowy

      Affiliations

    • SIAK Coordinating Center, Effingerstr. 40, CH-3008 Bern, Switzerland
  • ,
  • R Maibach

      Affiliations

    • SIAK Coordinating Center, Effingerstr. 40, CH-3008 Bern, Switzerland
  • ,
  • C Hürny

      Affiliations

    • Geriatrische Klinik, Bürgerspital, Rorschacher Strasse 94, CH-9000 St Gallen, Switzerland
  • ,
  • for the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) and the Swiss Institute for Applied Cancer Research (SIAK), Bern, Switzerland

Received 23 April 2001 ,Accepted 23 May 2001.

References 

  1. Sprangers MA, Schwartz CE. The challenge of response shift for quality-of-life-based clinical oncology research (Editorial). Ann. Oncol. 1999;10:747–749
  2. Sprangers MAG, Schwartz CE. Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research (a theoretical model). Soc. Sci. Med. 1999;48:1507–1515
  3. Bernhard J, Hürny C, Maibach R, Herrmann R, Laffer U. Quality of life as subjective experience (reframing of perception in patients with colon cancer undergoing radical resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)). Ann. Oncol. 1999;10:775–782
  4. Earle CC, Chapman RH, Baker CS, Bell CM, Stone PW, Sandberg EA, et al. Systematic overview of cost-utility assessments in oncology. J. Clin. Oncol. 2000;18:3302–3317
  5. Hürny C, van Wegberg B, Bacchi M, et al.  Subjective health estimations (SHE) in patients with advanced breast cancer (an adapted utility concept for clinical trials). Br. J. Cancer. 1998;77:985–991
  6. Howard GS, Ralph KM, Gulanick NA, Maxwell SE, Nance SW, Gerber SK. Intern validity in pretest-posttest self-report evaluations and a re-evaluation of retrospective pretests. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 1979;3:1–23
  7. Schwartz CE, Sprangers MAG. Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research. Soc. Sci. Med. 1999;48:1531–1548
  8. Torrance GW, Feeny DH, Furlong WJ, Barr RD, Zhang Y, Wang Q. Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Med. Care. 1996;34:702–722
  9. Mallows CL. Some comments on Cp. Technometrics. 1973;15:661–675
  10. Bernhard J, Hürny C. Gastrointestinal cancer. In:  Holland J editors. Psycho-oncology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998;p. 324–339
  11. Jansen SJ, Stiggelbout AM, Wakker PP, Nooij MA, Noordijk EM, Kievit J. Unstable preferences (a shift in valuation or an effect of the elicitation procedure?). Med. Decis. Making. 2000;20:62–71
  12. de Haes JCJM, Stiggelbout AM. Assessment of values, utilities and preferences in cancer patients. Cancer Treat. Rev. 1996;22(Suppl. A):13–26
  13. Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Sutherland HJ, Thiel EC. Do patients' evaluations of a future health state change when they actually enter that state?. Med. Care. 1993;31:1002–1012
  14. O'Connor AMC, Boyd NF, Warde P, Stolbach L, Till JE. Eliciting preferences for alternative drug therapies in oncology (influence of treatment outcome description, elicitation technique and treatment experience on preferences). J. Chronic. Dis. 1987;40:811–818
  15. Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Thiel EC, McGreal MJ. Cancer patients' evaluations of their current health states (the influences of expectations, comparisons, actual health status, and mood). Med. Decis. Making. 1992;12:115–122
  16. Guadagnoli E, Cleary P. How consistent is patient-reported pre-admission health status when collected during and after hospital stay?. Med. Care. 1995;33:106–112

PII: S0959-8049(01)00196-4

European Journal of Cancer
Volume 37, Issue 14 , Pages 1729-1735 , September 2001