European Journal of Cancer
Volume 39, Issue 9 , Pages 1290-1295, June 2003

Analysis of survival of mesothelioma cases in the Italian register (ReNaM)

  • A Marinaccio

      Affiliations

    • Department of Occupational Medicine, Epidemiology unit, ISPESL- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Prevention, Via Alessandria 220/E, 00198 Rome, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +39-06-44280396; fax +39-06-44250639
  • ,
  • M Nesti

      Affiliations

    • Department of Occupational Medicine, Epidemiology unit, ISPESL- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Prevention, Via Alessandria 220/E, 00198 Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • Regional Operational Centers

      Affiliations

    • Regional Operational Centers: Corrado Magnani, Cristiana Ivaldi, Paola Dalmasso, Dario Mirabelli, Benedetto Terracini, Annalisa Todesco (Piedmont); Valerio Gennaro, Fabio Montanaro, Anna Lazzarotto, Monica Bianchelli, Maria Vittoria Celesia (Liguria); Silvia Candela, Antonio Romanelli, Lucia Mangone (Emilia-Romagna); Enzo Merler, Elisabetta Chellini, Giuseppe Gorini, Stefano Silvestri, Valentina Cacciarini (Tuscany); Marina Musti, Domenica Cavone (, Puglia), Italy

Received 19 September 2002; received in revised form 19 December 2002; accepted 21 February 2003.

Abstract 

The Italian National Mesothelioma Register (ReNaM) was set up at ISPESL (the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Prevention) in 1993. Five Italian regions (Piedmont, Liguria, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany and Puglia, with a total of approximately 17 500 000 inhabitants) agreed to record mesothelioma cases according to guidelines established by ISPESL, to define exposure to asbestos and transmit the data to ISPESL. We describe an analysis of survival of 429 mesothelioma cases—392 pleural, 34 peritoneal and 3 in the pericardium—diagnosed during 1997, with variable follow-up from June 1999 to December 2001. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate survival rates, the log rank non-parametric test and Cox proportional hazard model to assess the role of prognostic factors such as age, gender, morphology, level of diagnostic certainty and modality of exposure. Median survival was 275 days (95% confidence interval (CI) 241–309) for pleural mesotheliomas and 157 days (95% CI: 118–196) for peritoneal mesotheliomas. Survival after diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma showed a statistically significant linear trend for age group at diagnosis, for males and females (P=0.006 and 0.008, respectively). The Cox proportional hazard model gave an adjusted relative risk (RRadj), for the fibrous histotype, of 2.96 (95% CI: 1.28–6.81; P=0.012) compared with cases with unspecified morphology; for epithelioid and biphasic morphologies, the risk was lower than unity. There was no significant difference in survival for cases with confirmed exposure (occupational, household or environmental) or without.

Keywords:  Mesothelioma, National register, Survival analysis, Prognostic factors

 

PII: S0959-8049(03)00233-8

doi:10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00233-8

European Journal of Cancer
Volume 39, Issue 9 , Pages 1290-1295, June 2003