European Journal of Cancer
Volume 41, Issue 11 , Pages 1533-1541 , July 2005

Standardised FDG uptake: A prognostic factor for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer

  • Gerben R. Borst

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • José S.A. Belderbos

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Ronald Boellaard

      Affiliations

    • Clinical PET Centre, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Emile F.I. Comans

      Affiliations

    • Clinical PET Centre, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Katrien De Jaeger

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Adriaan A. Lammertsma

      Affiliations

    • Clinical PET Centre, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Joos V. Lebesque

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +31 20 5122139; fax: +31 20 6691101.

Received 25 February 2005 ,Revised 29 March 2005 ,Accepted 31 March 2005.

References 

  1. Brundage MD, Davies D, Mackillop WJ. Prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer: a decade of progress. Chest. 2002;122:1037–1057
  2. Johnson BE. Biologic and molecular prognostic factors – impact on treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Chest. 1995;107:287S–290S
  3. Pauwels EK, Ribeiro MJ, Stoot JH, et al. FDG accumulation and tumor biology. Nucl Med Biol. 1998;25:317–322
  4. Duhaylongsod FG, Lowe VJ, Patz EF, et al. Lung tumor growth correlates with glucose metabolism measured by fluoride-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:1348–1352
  5. Higashi K, Ueda Y, Yagishita M, et al. FDG PET measurement of the proliferative potential of non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:85–92
  6. Vesselle H, Schmidt RA, Pugsley JM, et al. Lung cancer proliferation correlates with [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:3837–3844
  7. Sasaki R, Komaki R, Macapinlac H, et al. Uptake by positron emission tomography predicts outcome of non-small-cell lung cancer[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1136–1143
  8. Vansteenkiste JF, Stroobants SG, Dupont PJ, et al. Prognostic importance of the standardized uptake value on (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography scan in non-small-cell lung cancer: an analysis of 125 cases. Leuven Lung Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:3201–3206
  9. Higashi K, Ueda Y, Arisaka Y, et al. 18F-FDG uptake as a biologic prognostic factor for recurrence in patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:39–45
  10. Downey RJ, Akhurst T, Gonen M, et al. Preoperative F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography maximal standardized uptake value predicts survival after lung cancer resection. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3255–3260
  11. Ahuja V, Coleman RE, Herndon J, et al. The prognostic significance of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer. 1998;83:918–924
  12. Jeong HJ, Min JJ, Park JM, et al. Determination of the prognostic value of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by using positron emission tomography in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2002;23:865–870
  13. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–216
  14. Belderbos JS, De Jaeger K, Heemsbergen WD, et al. First results of a phase I/II dose escalation trial in non-small cell lung cancer using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2003;66:119–126
  15. Huang SC. Anatomy of SUV. Standardized uptake value. Nucl Med Biol. 2000;27:643–646
  16. Boellaard R, Krak NC, Hoekstra OS, et al. Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1519–1527
  17. Krak NC, Boellaard R, Hoekstra OS, et al. Effects of ROI definition and reconstruction method on quantitative outcome and applicability in a response monitoring trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;
  18. Langen KJ, Braun U, Rota KE, et al. The influence of plasma glucose levels on fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in bronchial carcinomas. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:355–359
  19. Lindholm P, Minn H, Leskinen-Kallio S, et al. Influence of the blood glucose concentration on FDG uptake in cancer – a PET study. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1–6
  20. Hoekstra CJ, Hoekstra OS, Stroobants SG, et al. Methods to monitor response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer with 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:1304–1309
  21. Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U, et al. Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. Eur J Cancer. 1999;35:1773–1782
  22. Fischer BM, Mortensen J, Hojgaard L. Positron emission tomography in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer: a systematic, quantitative review. Lancet Oncol. 2001;2:659–666
  23. Dwamena BA, Sonnad SS, Angobaldo JO, et al. Metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: mediastinal staging in the 1990s – meta-analytic comparison of PET and CT. Radiology. 1999;213:530–536
  24. Bradley J, Thorstad WL, Mutic S, et al. Impact of FDG-PET on radiation therapy volume delineation in non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59:78–86
  25. Kostakoglu L, Goldsmith SJ. 18F-FDG PET evaluation of the response to therapy for lymphoma and for breast, lung, and colorectal carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:224–239
  26. Mac Manus MP, Hicks RJ, Matthews JP, et al. Positron emission tomography is superior to computed tomography scanning for response-assessment after radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:1285–1292
  27. Harpole DH, Herndon JE, Wolfe WG, et al. A prognostic model of recurrence and death in stage I non-small cell lung cancer utilizing presentation, histopathology, and oncoprotein expression. Cancer Res. 1995;55:51–56
  28. Younes M, Brown RW, Stephenson M, et al. Overexpression of Glut1 and Glut3 in stage I non-small cell lung carcinoma is associated with poor survival. Cancer. 1997;80:1046–1051
  29. Nelson CA, Wang JQ, Leav I, et al. The interaction among glucose transport, hexokinase, and glucose-6-phosphatase with respect to 3H-2-deoxyglucose retention in murine tumor models. Nucl Med Biol. 1996;23:533–541

PII: S0959-8049(05)00338-2

doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.03.026

European Journal of Cancer
Volume 41, Issue 11 , Pages 1533-1541 , July 2005