« Previous
Next »
European Journal of Cancer
Volume 42, Issue 15
, Pages 2480-2491
, October 2006
Breast cancer: Multidisciplinary care and clinical outcomes
References
- Clinical Oncological Society of Australia, the Cancer Council of Australia and the National Cancer Control Initiative. Optimising cancer care in Australia. Melbourne: National Cancer Control Initiative, 2003.
- Cancer Guidance Sub-group of the Clinical Outcomes Group Improving Outcomes in Breast Cancer. Department of Health 1996; Manual Cat Nos 96 CC0021 & Research Evidence 96 CC0022 (July 1996).
- Department of Health. The NHS Cancer Plan. NHS 2000; London: Department of Health.
- . Multidisciplinary care for breast cancer: Barriers and solutions. The Breast Journal. 2003;9(1):60–63
- . Multidisciplinary care for patients with breast cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 2000;80(2):505–533
- . Interdisciplinary breast cancer care: declaring and improving the standard. Oncology. 2004;18(10):1263–1268
- . A multidisciplinary approach is needed. BMJ. 1996;312:1155–1156
- National Breast Cancer Centre. Multidisciplinary meetings for cancer care: a guide for health service providers. Camperdown: National Breast Cancer Centre; 2005.
- . Breast care is a team sport. The Breast Journal. 2004;10:469–472
- . Provider volume and clinical outcomes in surgery: Issues and implications. Bull Am College Surg. 2002;87:21–26
- Surgical caseload and outcomes for women with invasive breast cancer treated in Western Australia. Breast. 2005;14:11–17
- . Surgeon workload and survival from breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:487–491
- . Breast cancer: Do specialists make a difference. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:2003
- . Is there a relationship between case volume and survival in breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2003;185:407–410
- The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management. Cancer. 2001;91:1231–1237
- . Breast cancer survival by teaching status of the initial treating hospital. CMAJ. 2001;164:183–188
- . Effect of surgical subspecialization on breast cancer outcome. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1420–1425
- Hospital volume differences and five-year survival from breast cancer. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:454–457
- . Multidisciplinary breast cancer clinics – Do they work. Cancer. 1997;79:2380–2384
- . Survival outcome of care by specialist surgeons in breast cancer: a study of 3786 patients in the west of Scotland. BMJ. 1996;312:145–148
- . Influence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment on survival from breast cancer. Lancet. 1995;345:1265–1270
- . Treatment differences and other prognostic factors related to breast cancer survival – delivery systems and medical outcomes. JAMA. 1994;271:1163–1168
- . Variations in breast cancer management between a teaching and non-teaching district. Eur J Cancer A. 1992;28:1945–1950
- . Case-survival rates for infiltrating ductal carcinomas by category of hospital at diagnosis in South Australia. Med J Aust. 1991;154:695–697
- Morrow M, Stewart A, Sylvester JA, Bland K. Hospital volume predicts outcome in breast cancer: A National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) study. In: Abstract presented at ASCO May 2000; accessed via American College of Surgeons website 23/8/05: www.facs.org/cancer/ncdbabstract.html.
- Breast cancer teams: the impact of constitution, new cancer workload, and methods of operation on their effectiveness. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:15–22
- . Large differences in survival are not explained. BMJ. 1996;312:1155
PII: S0959-8049(06)00524-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.05.023
© 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
European Journal of Cancer
Volume 42, Issue 15
, Pages 2480-2491
, October 2006
