European Journal of Cancer
Volume 43, Issue 1 , Pages 55-63, January 2007

Results from an in vitro and a clinical/pharmacological phase I study with the combination irinotecan and sorafenib

  • K. Mross

      Affiliations

    • Tumour Biology Center at the Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel.: +49 761 206 1833; fax: +49 761 206 1832.
  • ,
  • S. Steinbild

      Affiliations

    • Tumour Biology Center at the Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany
  • ,
  • F. Baas

      Affiliations

    • Tumour Biology Center at the Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany
  • ,
  • D. Gmehling

      Affiliations

    • Tumour Biology Center at the Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany
  • ,
  • M. Radtke

      Affiliations

    • Bayer HealthCare AG, Wuppertal, Germany
  • ,
  • D. Voliotis

      Affiliations

    • Bayer HealthCare AG, Wuppertal, Germany
  • ,
  • E. Brendel

      Affiliations

    • Bayer HealthCare AG, Wuppertal, Germany
  • ,
  • O. Christensen

      Affiliations

    • Bayer HealthCare AG, Elberfeld, Germany
  • ,
  • C. Unger

      Affiliations

    • Tumour Biology Center at the Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany

Received 28 July 2006; accepted 4 August 2006.

Abstract 

Purpose

This single-centre, open-label, phase I dose-escalation study was performed to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy of sorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, combined with irinotecan, a cytotoxic agent, in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumours.

Patients and methods

In an initial dose-escalation phase, patients received irinotecan 125 mg/m2 and sorafenib 100, 200 and 400 mg twice daily (bid) (cohorts 1–3). In an extended phase, colorectal cancer (CRC) patients received fixed-dose irinotecan 140 mg and sorafenib 400 mg bid (cohort 4).

Results

Thirty-four patients were treated: 20 in the dose-escalation phase (common tumour types: CRC [45%], ovarian [5%], pancreatic [5%]) and 14 patients in the CRC extension. Frequent drug-related adverse events were gastrointestinal symptoms, dermatological reactions and constitutional symptoms. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Generally, concomitant administration of irinotecan had no impact on the PK of sorafenib. Sorafenib 100 or 200 mg bid had no impact on the PK of irinotecan or its metabolite SN38. In contrast, sorafenib 400 mg bid significantly increased irinotecan and SN38 exposures; however, this was not associated with increased toxicities. Stable disease was achieved in 12/20 (60%) evaluable patients in cohorts 1–3, and 10/13 (77%) evaluable patients in cohort 4. A further patient from cohort 4 had a partial response of >200 days. The increase of SN38 exposure might be due to inhibition of formation of the SN38 glucuronide by sorafenib. In vitro, sorafenib strongly inhibited SN38 glucuronidation in human liver microsomes as indicated by a Ki value of 2.7 μmol/l.

Conclusion

Sorafenib 400 mg bid can be combined with irinotecan 125 mg/m2 or 140 mg for the treatment of patients with advanced, refractory solid tumours, although monitoring for toxicity is recommended.

Keywords: Sorafenib, Irinotecan, Multi-kinase inhibitor, Phase I

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0959-8049(06)00803-3

doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2006.08.032

European Journal of Cancer
Volume 43, Issue 1 , Pages 55-63, January 2007