Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 84-94 (January 2010)


View previous. 11 of 28 View next.

Dose-intensified epirubicin versus standard-dose epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by CMF in breast cancer patients with 10 or more positive lymph nodes: Results of a randomised trial (GABG-IV E-93) – The German Adjuvant Breast Cancer Group

for the German Adjuvant Breast Cancer GroupWolfgang EiermannaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Erika Grafb, Beyhan Atasevena, Bettina Conradc, Jörn Hilfrichd, Heidi Massinger-Bieble, Sabine Vesciaf, Sibylle Loiblg, Gunter von Minckwitzgh, Martin Schumacherb, Manfred Kaufmannh

Received 23 June 2009; received in revised form 1 September 2009; accepted 1 October 2009. published online 02 November 2009.

Abstract 

To compare dose-intensified epirubicin monotherapy with a standard sequential regimen, patients with primary breast cancer and ⩾10 involved axillary nodes were randomised to either four 21-day cycles of epirubicin 120mg/m2 (E120; n=202) or four 21-day cycles of epirubicin 90mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 (EC) followed by three 28-day cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF; n=209). Simultaneous hormonal treatment was applied in both arms. At 5years’ median follow-up, the 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rates were 47.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.2–55.2%) for E120 and 45.9% (38.5–53.3%) for EC-CMF. E120 was as effective as EC-CMF with regard to EFS (hazard ratio [HR] for E120 versus EC-CMF 1.04; 95% CI, 0.79–1.36; p=0.79) and overall survival (HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.77–1.46; p=0.72). The data demonstrate that 4 cycles of dose-intensified epirubicin monotherapy can be as effective as 7 cycles of standard sequential polychemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients with ⩾10 positive lymph nodes, despite treatment with a single agent and a shorter treatment duration.

a Frauenklinik vom Roten Kreuz, Taxistraße 3, 80637 München, Germany

b Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Straße 26, 79104 Freiburg, Germany

c Brustzentrum, Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Kassel, Weinbergstraße 7, 34117 Kassel, Germany

d Henriettenstiftung, Schwemannstraße 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany

e Gemeinschaftspraxis, Marktplatz/Weißbräugasse 2a, 94065 Waldkirchen, Germany

f Stadtkrankenhaus Hanau, Leimenstr. 20, 63450 Hanau, Germany

g German Breast Group, GBG Forschungs GmbH, Schleussnerstraße 42, 63263 Neu-Isenburg, Germany

h Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, J.W. Goethe Universität, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel.: +49 89 15706 620x621; fax: +49 89 15706 623.

 This report presents the final analysis of trial GABG-IV E-93. Preliminary results were reported at the ASCO Annual Meeting in 2001.

PII: S0959-8049(09)00726-6

doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2009.10.001


View previous. 11 of 28 View next.