European Journal of Cancer
Volume 47, Issue 1 , Pages 8-32, January 2011

2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours

  • M.S. Aapro

      Affiliations

    • Multidisciplinary Oncology Institute, Clinique de Genolier, 1, route du Muids, 1272 Genolier, Switzerland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel.: +41 22 366 9106; fax: +41 22 366 9131.
    • Member of the EORTC Task Force Elderly.
  • ,
  • J. Bohlius

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland
    • Methodology Expert.
  • ,
  • D.A. Cameron

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
    • Representative of the EORTC Breast Cancer Group.
  • ,
  • Lissandra Dal Lago

      Affiliations

    • EORTC Headquarters, Av. E. Mounier 83, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
    • Representative of the EORTC Headquarters.
  • ,
  • J. Peter Donnelly

      Affiliations

    • Radboud University Nijmegen, Department of Medical Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • Representative of the EORTC Infectious Disease Group.
  • ,
  • N. Kearney

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Dundee, 11 Airlie Place, Dundee, Scotland, UK
    • Nursing Expert, mandated by EONS (European Oncology Nursing Society).
  • ,
  • G.H. Lyman

      Affiliations

    • Duke University and Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center, Durham, NC, USA
    • US Expert.
  • ,
  • R. Pettengell

      Affiliations

    • Department of Haematology, St George’s Hospital, University of London, London, UK
    • Member of the EORTC and Lymphoma Expert.
  • ,
  • V.C. Tjan-Heijnen

      Affiliations

    • Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
    • Representative of the EORTC Lung Cancer Group.
  • ,
  • J. Walewski

      Affiliations

    • The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Institute and Oncology Centre, Warszawa, Poland
    • Representative of the EORTC Lymphoma Group.
  • ,
  • Damien C. Weber

      Affiliations

    • Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
    • Central European Cooperative Oncology Group (www.cecog.org).
  • ,
  • C. Zielinski

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University Vienna, Austria
    • Representative of the EORTC Radiation Oncology Group.

Received 29 September 2010; accepted 18 October 2010. published online 22 November 2010.

Abstract 

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is a major risk factor for infection-related morbidity and mortality and also a significant dose-limiting toxicity in cancer treatment. Patients developing severe (grade 3/4) or febrile neutropenia (FN) during chemotherapy frequently receive dose reductions and/or delays to their chemotherapy. This may impact the success of treatment, particularly when treatment intent is either curative or to prolong survival.

In Europe, prophylactic treatment with granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs), such as filgrastim (including approved biosimilars), lenograstim or pegfilgrastim is available to reduce the risk of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. However, the use of G-CSF prophylactic treatment varies widely in clinical practice, both in the timing of therapy and in the patients to whom it is offered. The need for generally applicable, European-focused guidelines led to the formation of a European Guidelines Working Party by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the publication in 2006 of guidelines for the use of G-CSF in adult cancer patients at risk of chemotherapy-induced FN. A new systematic literature review has been undertaken to ensure that recommendations are current and provide guidance on clinical practice in Europe. We recommend that patient-related adverse risk factors, such as elderly age (⩾65years) and neutrophil count be evaluated in the overall assessment of FN risk before administering each cycle of chemotherapy. It is important that after a previous episode of FN, patients receive prophylactic administration of G-CSF in subsequent cycles. We provide an expanded list of common chemotherapy regimens considered to have a high (⩾20%) or intermediate (10–20%) risk of FN. Prophylactic G-CSF continues to be recommended in patients receiving a chemotherapy regimen with high risk of FN. When using a chemotherapy regimen associated with FN in 10–20% of patients, particular attention should be given to patient-related risk factors that may increase the overall risk of FN. In situations where dose-dense or dose-intense chemotherapy strategies have survival benefits, prophylactic G-CSF support is recommended. Similarly, if reductions in chemotherapy dose intensity or density are known to be associated with a poor prognosis, primary G-CSF prophylaxis may be used to maintain chemotherapy. Clinical evidence shows that filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim have clinical efficacy and we recommend the use of any of these agents to prevent FN and FN-related complications where indicated. Filgrastim biosimilars are also approved for use in Europe. While other forms of G-CSF, including biosimilars, are administered by a course of daily injections, pegfilgrastim allows once-per-cycle administration. Choice of formulation remains a matter for individual clinical judgement. Evidence from multiple low level studies derived from audit data and clinical practice suggests that some patients receive suboptimal daily G-CSFs; the use of pegfilgrastim may avoid this problem.

Keywords: Antineoplastic agents, Filgrastim, Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, Lenograstim, Neoplasms, Neutropenia, Pegfilgrastim, Guideline

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0959-8049(10)01029-4

doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2010.10.013

European Journal of Cancer
Volume 47, Issue 1 , Pages 8-32, January 2011